Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy (CCV) is a rare distinct idiopathic microangiopathy of the superficial cutaneous vasculature. Seven new cases are reported (6 females and 1 male) ranging in age from 42 to 85 years, with some showing unusual clinical and histopathological findings. All presented with macular telangiectases starting on the lower extremities and spreading progressively in 5 cases and were suspected to have generalized essential telangiectasia. Two cases had a history of over 20 years. One case had lesions in the abdominal striae, and 1 was markedly ecchymotic. All skin biopsies showed the characteristic features of CCV with dilatation and marked thickening of the walls of superficial dermal blood vessels displaying reduplication of the basement membrane on periodic acid-Schiff-diastase stain and deposition of hyaline collagenous material immunostaining as collagen type IV, and showing decreased or absent actin staining. However, the changes were subtle and only seen focally in some biopsies. Few lymphoid cells were present around occasional vessels. Electron microscopy showed increased basement membrane lamellae with marked deposition of normal and some abnormal collagen (Luse-like bodies) and focal endothelial damage, suggesting reparative perivascular fibrosis resulting from repeated endothelial injury. These cases (and all 18 previously reported ones) are of a wide age range and no gender predilection. This disorder is underdiagnosed, and it is likely that some cases clinically suspected to be generalized essential telangiectasia may actually represent CCV. Better recognition by dermatologists may lead to more biopsies from patients with generalized telangiectasia and a further understanding of the pathogenesis of CCV and its relationship to other cutaneous vascular disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".