MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074686150 · doi:10.1002/cjce.21961

Investigating carbon monoxide and propene oxidation on a platinum diesel oxidation catalyst

2014· article· en· W2074686150 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Carolina Sola, Ali Abedi, Robert E. Hayes, William S. Epling, Martin Votsmeier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPropeneCarbon monoxidePlatinumCatalysisDiesel fuelMonolithContext (archaeology)Catalytic oxidationChemistryHydrogenChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a detailed analysis of global kinetic models for the oxidation of carbon monoxide and propene, in the presence of water, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, excess oxygen and nitrogen. The context is the automotive catalytic converter for a lean burn engine. Experimental results are presented for a commercial platinum diesel oxidation catalyst used in the form of a 400 CPSI washcoated monolith. Models are developed based on the classical LHHW format presented by Voltz et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 1973;12:294. The models are developed stepwise for experiments for each reactant alone and the predictive ability of the results is examined. It is found that it is necessary to use experiments with both reactants present to develop a reliable model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207