Dlx3 is expressed in the ventral forebrain of chicken embryos: implications for the evolution of the Dlx gene family
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The archetypal genomic arrangement of vertebrate Dlx genes is as three bigene clusters (Dlx1/2, Dlx3/4, Dlx5/6). Phylogenetic sequence analysis of mouse and zebrafish Dlx clusters supports the notion that the Dlx3/4 cluster is more derived and the absence of expression of either Dlx3 or Dlx4 in the central nervous system, as reported to date, is consistent with this. Together, these observations have prompted a model in which cis-regulatory elements, responsible for directing Dlx gene transcription in the forebrain, were lost from the Dlx3/4 bigene cluster prior to the divergence of tetrapods from fish. Here, we describe Dlx3 expression in the forebrain of chicken embryos; this constitutes the first documented evidence of expression of either Dlx3 or Dlx4 in the central nervous system of a vertebrate. Our observations have implications for models of the evolutionary history of the Dlx gene family, for the genomic organization of Dlx genes in birds and for functional redundancy of Dlx gene function during avian forebrain development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".