MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074718332 · doi:10.7202/043333ar

L'impartialité structurelle des tribunaux administratifs

2005· article· fr· W2074718332 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Patrice Garant

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de droit · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Social Philosophy
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesJurisprudencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les tribunaux administratifs de la famille des organismes de régulation ont toujours eu droit de cité dans le système de droit administratif québécois comme organismes multifonctionnels (arrêt Brosseau de 1989). Mais le phénomène de multifonctionnalité est remis en question par les exigences d'indépendance institutionnelle et d'impartialité structurelle découlant de l'article 23 de la Charte québécoise. Inspirée par la jurisprudence des affaires Lippé et Généreux, la Cour d'appel vient d'invalider l'un des plus visibles de ces tribunaux, la Régie des alcools des jeux et des courses. La multifonctionnalité est-elle compatible avec les exigences de la Charte ? Il s'agit là d'un des aspects de la crise de la justice administrative. La Cour suprême du Canada saisie du problème s’orientera-t-elle vers une conception atténuée ou modulée de l'impartialité structurelle, ou bien le législateur devra-t-il procéder à des réformes radicales ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.023
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers de droitSame topicLegal and Social PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207