MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074723155 · doi:10.1139/l07-135

Safety performance of freeway sections and relation to length of speed-change lanes

2008· article· en· W2074723155 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Mohamed Sarhan, Yasser Hassan, A O Abd El Halim

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersTransport Canada
KeywordsCollisionGeometric designMerge (version control)Traffic speedTransport engineeringKinematicsNegative binomial distributionComputer scienceRegression analysisOperating speedSimulationEngineeringMathematicsStatisticsCivil engineeringPoisson distributionComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design of freeway entrances and exits requires managing the high operating speeds on the through lanes and the intense lane-change manoeuvres due to merging and diverging. Therefore, adequate lengths between these entrances and exits and provision of adequate speed-change lanes would help drivers execute such tasks safely. Most of the previous research has focused on analyzing operational conditions of the merge and diverge areas based on kinematic analysis of speeds and distances. However, little research has addressed the safety effects of merging and diverging and the interrelationship with geometric features. In this study, 26 interchanges were selected to quantify the effects of ramp terminal spacing and traffic volumes on safety performance through regression analysis. Negative binomial models were developed using 5 year collision data. Modelling attempts resulted in several statistically significant models relating traffic volumes and geometric features to collision frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207