Progressive familial hearing loss in Muckle-Wells syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONCLUSION: The age-dependent disease progression requires accelerating diagnosis of Muckle-Wells syndrome (MWS) in order to start treatment as early as possible. The most frequent, but not obligate symptoms are familial fatigue, hearing loss, and arthralgia. The design of further clinical trials should focus on hearing in order to document the long-term effect of anti-interleukin (IL)-1 drugs on hearing preservation. OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the otologic features of a genetically defined syndrome causing progressive hearing loss by cochlear degeneration. This is the first study reporting the pretreatment otologic presentation of a selected population with familial MWS. METHODS: A single-center cohort was examined by audiologic and neurotologic methods including pure tone audiograms, vestibular testing, and tinnitus questionnaire. The audiograms of members of the same family were compared to describe the family-specific risk of hearing loss progression. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (aged 3-72 years) belonging to four families with three different mutations of the NLRP3 gene were examined. Almost all patients (89%, 17/19) demonstrated bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Hearing loss started in the high frequencies and led to profound deafness in the most severe cases. Even in cases of profound hearing loss the vestibular caloric reactivity was normal. Nearly half of the adults reported intermittent or permanent tinnitus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".