MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074772519 · doi:10.1517/14656566.8.11.1769

The combined etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring

2007· review· en· W2074772519 on OpenAlexaff
Marie-Soleil Wagner, Raquel De Paz Arias, Deborah Nucatola

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEtonogestrelVaginal ringMedicineDesogestrelDosingEthinylestradiolGynecologyFamily planningSterilization (economics)PopulationObstetricsIntravaginal administrationHormonal contraceptionResearch methodologyVaginaPharmacologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many factors influence the effectiveness of contraceptive methods. Oral contraceptives are the second most popular contraceptive method after female sterilization in the US. A total of 25% of women do not use their oral contraceptives correctly; 30% of women do not use them consistently. Several new contraceptive methods with alternate routes of delivery and less frequent dosing are available. The combined etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring is marketed under the name of NuvaRing. This is the only contraceptive ring approved by the FDA. The administration of steroids by the vaginal route may offer many advantages. Because of less frequent dosing, self-administration, and possibly, an improved side effect profile, the ring has the potential to increase successful use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on PharmacotherapySame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207