Predicting site-specific overwintering of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) using a habitat suitability index
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brown trout ( Salmo trutta ) site-specific overwintering was studied in an ice-covered stream in northern Sweden. We monitored 238 individually tagged juvenile trout (body length 120–204 mm) from late summer until late winter using portable passive integrated transponder tag equipment and related it to a habitat suitability index. Minimum habitat suitability index explained a large portion (66.8%) of the variation in the proportion of individuals that remained and overwintered at specific sites from late summer until late winter. Our study design detected three scales of overwinter movements: (i) individuals that remained within their tagging site (site-scale movements); (ii) individuals that moved to other reaches (reach-scale movements), which were probably the most common; and (iii) individuals that left the study stream (stream-scale movements). There were no differences in size at tagging among individuals that adopted different scales of movements. We suggest that habitat suitability index can be used as a tool to predict site specific residency and, thus, habitat conditions in stream reaches during winter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".