Lineage allocation and asymmetries in the early mouse embryo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mouse blastocyst, at the time of implantation, has three distinct cell lineages: epiblast (EPI), trophoblast and primitive endoderm (PE). Interactions between these three lineages and their directional growth and migration are critical for establishing the initial asymmetries that result in anterior-posterior patterning of the embryo proper. We have re-investigated the timing of specification of the three lineages in relation to the differential allocation of progeny of the first two blastomeres to the embryonic versus abembryonic axis of the blastocyst. We find that the majority of cells of the inner cell mass (ICM) are specified to be EPI or PE by the mid 3.5 day blastocyst and that this is associated with localized expression of GATA-6 in the ICM. We propose a model for molecular specification of the blastocyst lineages in which a combination of cell division order, signal transduction differences between inner and outer cells and segregation of key transcription factors can produce a blastocyst in which all three lineages are normally set up in an ordered, lineage-dependent manner, but which can also reconstruct a blastocyst when division order or cell interactions are disturbed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".