MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074870720 · doi:10.1126/sageke.2002.29.nw99

Taking Complement Well

2002· article· en· W2074870720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mary Beckman

Bibliographic record

VenueScience of Aging Knowledge Environment · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflammationMicrogliaComplement systemNeuroscienceImmune systemImmunologyComplement (music)DiseaseCell biologyAmyloid (mycology)BiologyMedicinePathologyGeneticsGenePhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Like the baby brother left holding the cookie jar his sister emptied, not all inflammation in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is as blameworthy as appearances suggest. According to new research, certain inflammatory molecules permeate ravaged areas of a diseased brain, but they help more than hurt, at least in mice. The results might allow investigators to determine which inflammatory processes to bolster and which to suppress in the effort to curtail AD. The hallmarks of AD are neuronal degeneration and plaques full of β amyloid, a protein formed by the aberrant processing of β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) (see "Detangling Alzheimer's Disease" ). Evidence conflicts about whether inflammation might cause one or both of these problems. It flourishes in Alzheimer's brains, and anti-inflammatory drugs appear to slow cognitive decline (see McGeer Review ). On the other hand, stimulating the process can slow plaque formation in a mouse model of the disease. Researchers aren't sure how inflammation can swing both ways, but the answer might lie in a biochemical system named the complement cascade that helps the immune system eliminate microbes and infected cells. Some proteins involved in the complement cascade, including one called C3, break down into an active form, C3b, in response to invasion. C3b marks foreign proteins on cells and attracts other complement proteins that punch holes in cell membranes they encounter. The tagging capability also targets proteins for destruction, and this skill might impede AD. The hole punchers, in contrast, perforate willy-nilly and can kill healthy cells--including neurons--in their vicinity. Human Alzheimer's plaques teem with C3b-adorned β amyloid and the cell-drilling proteins, leading some researchers to argue that β amyloid draws C3. Its product summons the piercing proteins, which then kill off nearby neurons. To pin down the complement cascade's role in AD, Wyss-Coray and colleagues thwarted the system in mice. From previous work, Wyss-Coray knew that mice engineered to manufacture human APP (hAPP) accumulate less brain β amyloid if they also overproduce TGF-β, a molecule that promotes inflammation. In the current study, they found that such mice had twice as much C3 in their brains as did hAPP mice without TGF-β. To find out if blocking C3 enhances plaque formation, the team created hAPP mice that crank out a protein called Crry, a complement inhibitor. By 1 year of age, the animals had accumulated two to three times as much brain β amyloid as had mice with complement, and they had lost almost half of their Alzheimer-susceptible neurons. These results indicate that the complement cascade protects brains from β-amyloid deposits. Mouse and human diseases differ, cautions neuroscientist Patrick McGeer of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, so the current work might not shed light on human AD. For example, human Alzheimer's brains have far more hole punchers than the animal brains do. However, neurobiologist Joseph Rogers of the Sun Health Research Institute in Sun City, Arizona, says McGeer's reservations "don't negate the impact of the study." Whether or not the work relates to the pore-forming proteins, he says, "this study shows [that] if you don't have complement, [β amyloid] builds up. We need to learn to harness this beneficial mechanism while dampening its toxic effects." In AD as in life, sometimes it's nice to get complemented. --Mary Beckman; suggested by Amir Sadighi Akha T. Wyss-Coray, F. Yan, A. H.-T. Lin, J. D. Lambris, J. J. Alexander, R. J. Quigg, E. Masliah, Prominent neurodegeneration and increased plaque formation in complement-inhibited Alzheimer's mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 15 July 2002 [e-pub ahead of print]. [Abstract] [Full text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0730.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience of Aging Knowledge EnvironmentSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207