MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074871835 · doi:10.1139/v05-260

Ditopic receptors of hexaamide derivatives derived from hexahomotrioxacalix[3]arene triacetic acid

2006· article· en· W2074871835 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Takehiko Yamato, Shofiur Rahman, Xi Zeng, Fumika Kitajima, Jeong Tae Gil

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Sensors and Ion Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAmideHydrogen bondMoietyHalideIntramolecular forceDichloromethaneMedicinal chemistryMetal ions in aqueous solutionAlkali metalChemical shiftTitrationIntermolecular forceInorganic chemistryMetalStereochemistryMoleculeSolventOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lower rim functionalized hexahomotrioxacalix[3]arene hexaamide 7 having an amino acid moiety with cone conformation was synthesized from triol 1 by a stepwise reaction. The different extractability for alkali metal ions, transition metal ions, and alkylammonium ions from water into dichloromethane was discussed. Owing to the strong intramolecular hydrogen bond between the neighboring NH and CO groups in hexaamide 7, its affinity to metal cations was weakened. Hexaamide 7 shows a single selectivity to n-BuNH 3 + . The anion complexation of hexaamide 7 was also studied by 1 H NMR titration experiments. Hexaamide 7 binds halides through the intermolecular hydrogen bond among the NH hydrogens of the amide in a 1:1 fashion in CDCl 3 . Thus, hexaamide 7 serves as a heteroditopic receptor that can complex with halides (Cl – , Br – ) and n-BuNH 3 + at the same time. The association constants calculated from the chemical shift changes of the amide protons are K a = 536 ± 32 (mol/L) –1 for Cl – and K a = 230 ± 17 (mol/L) –1 for Br – .Key words: hexahomotrioxacalix[3]arenes, ionophores, molecular recognition, ammonium ion, ditopic receptor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMolecular Sensors and Ion DetectionFrench-language works237,207