A Modified Access Technique for Retroperitoneoscopic Renal Surgery in Children
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Present techniques for retroperitoneal endoscopic (RPE) access in children mimic those in adults but often result in peritoneal entry or gas leaks, both of which lead to a decrease in the retroperitoneal space. We describe a modification to the access technique that obviates these problems, thus, facilitating RPE in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the lateral decubitus position the initial port is placed immediately lateral to the paraspinal muscles, similar to open dorsal lumbotomy fascial incision. A 5 mm skin incision is made at the level of the costovertebral angle and an artery forceps used to tunnel bluntly past the lumbodorsal fascia. A 5 mm port is placed with a blunt trocar, and expansion of the retroperitoneal space performed with the telescope and gas insufflation. Ancillary ports are placed and the telescope then moved to an anterior subcostal port where popular RPE approaches place the initial port. RESULTS: Eighteen procedures were performed in children with a mean age of 10.8 years, including 12 nephrectomies, 3 dismembered pyeloplasties, 1 partial nephrectomy, 1 nephroureterectomy and 1 parapelvic cyst decortication. No gas leaks occurred, with 1 minor peritoneal entry early in the series not related to the access. Average surgical time for nephrectomy was 178 minutes (range 120 to 240). No intraoperative complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: We present a safe and effective technique of initial port placement that follows the principles of open lumbotomy exposure. This approach to RPE minimizes peritoneal entry and gas leaks, thus, maximizing surgical exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it