MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074878838 · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-8-s2-p45

Synchronization of interhippocampal ripple events (80–200 Hz) by long-projection inhibitory neurons

2007· article· en· W2074878838 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Tiesinga, Xiaoli Li, Seiichi Sakatani, Zsolt Boldogkői, Hajime Hirase, Attila Sı́k

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Neuroscience · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInhibitory postsynaptic potentialNeuroscienceSynchronization (alternating current)Projection (relational algebra)RippleComputer sciencePsychologyMathematicsPhysicsTopology (electrical circuits)CombinatoricsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network oscillations between the two hippocampi are\nhighly synchronized. Synchronized theta is believed to be\nthe result of the common input from the septal region,\nwhereas the mechanism of the ripple synchronization is\nnot well understood. It was previously demonstrated\nusing partial coherence analysis that the "coupling"\nbetween the two CA1 regions of hippocampi during theta\noscillations is stronger than that between the individual\nlayers of the same hippocampus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC NeuroscienceSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207