MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074907433 · doi:10.1002/mop.24645

UWB binomial curved monopole with binomial curved ground plane

2009· article· en· W2074907433 on OpenAlex
M.A. Habib, Mourad Nedil, A. Djaiz, Tayeb A. Denidni

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonopole antennaGround planeJ-pole antennaCoplanar waveguideOmnidirectional antennaHelical antennaBandwidth (computing)MicrowaveAntenna (radio)EngineeringElectronic engineeringPhysicsAcousticsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsCoaxial antenna

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The design of a new ultra‐wideband (UWB) coplanar waveguide antenna is presented. The proposed antenna is a printed‐circuit monopole using coplanar technology. The radiating element is a modified monopole with an optimal shape based on a binomial function. The ground plane is also designed with the same law. Different orders of this binomial function are considered. The antenna shape and dimensions are optimized to achieve an UWB bandwidth operation covering the frequency range from 3.1 to 10.6 GHz. A prototype of the designed antenna was fabricated and measured. Obtained results show that the proposed antenna provides omnidirectional elevation pattern across the operating band. Results provided by simulations and measurements are presented and discussed; they show a good agreement. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 51: 2308–2313, 2009; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.24645

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it