Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article is the result of research in Sweden and the Netherlands on identity, sexuality, masculinity, and school discourse. Sweden and the Netherlands were selected because of their international reputations as sexually liberal and egalitarian societies. The interviews disclose two societies that both uphold and transgress these reputations. Interviewees were between 15 and 23. All but three were gay, lesbian, or transsexual. What I present here is a preliminary analysis of seven of those interviews, none of whom identified as heterosexual. The paper discusses masculinity, schooling, gender, and identity. Discourse of masculinity and gender in Sweden and the Netherlands differ profoundly, despite some important similarities. Emphasis on masculinity is more pronounced in Sweden. Also, the paper includes data from the interviews of two women. While this may seem unusual in a study of boys and men, the women contend with masculinity discourse and offer considerable insight into male subjectivity and gender in their society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it