MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074951624 · doi:10.1063/1.2219080

Reaction of thin Ni films with Ge: Phase formation and texture

2006· article· en· W2074951624 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor materials and interfaces
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
FundersCanada Research ChairsU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsAmorphous solidEpitaxyTexture (cosmology)Substrate (aquarium)Materials scienceGermaniumPole figurePhase (matter)CrystallographyScatteringDiffractionThin filmAnalytical Chemistry (journal)X-ray crystallographyChemistryOpticsNanotechnologyMetallurgyLayer (electronics)SiliconPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solid-state reaction between a 30-nm-thick Ni film and Ge substrates was investigated using in situ x-ray diffraction, diffuse light scattering, and four-point probe electrical measurements. Our results reveal that Ni5Ge3 and NiGe appear consecutively on Ge(111) while they grow simultaneously on amorphous Ge(α-Ge) and Ge(001). Furthermore, phase formation temperatures depend strongly on the nature of the substrate being the lowest on α-Ge and the highest on Ge(111). X-ray pole figure measurements of the NiGe phase obtained from the reaction with an amorphous substrate indicate a completely random texture while several epitaxial and axiotaxial texture components are observed on both Ge(001) and Ge(111). The texturing for the NiGe film on Ge(111), which showed a sequential phase formation, is an order of magnitude more pronounced than for the film on Ge(001) which showed a simultaneous growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it