MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074961235 · doi:10.1139/l00-011

Méthode générale d'identification paramétrique : application a l'étude thermophysique de quelques matériaux locaux utilisés dans la construction au maroc (platre - liège - brique creuse)

2000· article· en· W2074961235 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alae El Bakkouri, Said Boussaid, Hassan Ezbakhe, Taib Ajzoul, A El Bouardi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicBuilding materials and conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal diffusivityThermalMaterials sciencePhysicsMineralogyChemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research for habitat comfort conditions goes through a better knowledge of the thermal behavior of materials for building surfaces subject to thermal perturbations. This paper presents a general method for the simultaneous identification of the thermal diffusivity a and of the surface transfer coefficients, one for the irradiated face h 0 and one for the non-irradiated face h e , of a single-layer or multi-layer building surface. The experimental technique used, which is called box method, is based on the exploitation of the experimental thermograph of the non-irradiated face. The results of the identification are given for several construction materials (hollow brick, plaster, cork). The noteworthy influence of the number of parameters to identify is also exposed.Key words: Construction and insulation materials, measure and identification, thermal diffusivity, thermal loss coefficients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicBuilding materials and conservationFrench-language works237,207