Magnetoelastic coupling within a Landau model of phase transitions: Application to the frustrated triangular antiferromagnet CsNiCl<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A model Landau free energy is proposed in order to describe elastic coupling to spin degrees of freedom in systems exhibiting phase transitions which involve long-range magnetic order. Using rigourous symmetry arguments, various interaction terms are derived for magnetic materials with a hexagonal crystal structure. The model is applied to the frustrated triangular antiferromagnet CsNiCl${}_{3}$ and used to analyze and correlate a wide variety of experimental results such as the magnetic phase diagram, magnetization, strains, and elastic constant measurements at low temperatures. Good agreement between the model and the data is obtained for the temperature and magnetic field dependence of ${C}_{33}$ and ${C}_{66}$ in the vicinity of phase transitions. In particular, the analysis shows that the anomaly observed in the field dependence of ${C}_{33}$, close to the spin-flop phase boundary (${H}_{\mathit{SF}}\ensuremath{\simeq}2$ T), is dominated by the field dependence of the magnetic susceptibility. It is also found that higher order magnetoelastic coupling terms are required to reproduce the qualitative behavior of the elastic constants in the vicinity of the phase transitions. Our results demonstrate that a straightforward mean-field model which incorporates the correct system symmetries provides a powerful tool for relating complex spin configurations to the elastic and other response functions. The present work also serves to complement and expand our earlier results [G. Quirion et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 077202 (2006)].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".