MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075038987 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v5n4p58

Discussing a More Fundamental Concept Than the Minimal Residual Method to Solve Linear System in a Krylov Subspace

2013· article· en· W2075038987 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Taiwan UniversityNational Science Council
KeywordsMathematicsLinear subspaceKrylov subspaceResidualSubspace topologyProjection (relational algebra)CombinatoricsLinear systemApplied mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsAlgorithmMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A more fundamental concept than the minimal residual method is proposed in this paper to solve an $n$-dimensional linear equations system ${\bf A}{\bf x}={\bf b}$ in an $m$-dimensional Krylov subspace. We maximize the orthogonal projection of ${\bf b}$ onto ${\bf y}$: $={\bf A}{\bf x}$. Then, we can prove that the maximal projection solution (MP) is better than that obtained by the least squares solution (LS) with $\|{\bf b}-{\bf A}{\bf x}_{\mbox{\scriptsize MP}}\|<\|{\bf b}-{\bf A}{\bf x}_{\mbox{\scriptsize LS}}\|$. Examples are discussed which confirm the above finding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it