Vibration Localization in Plates With Misplaced Intermediate Supports in Two Orthogonal Directions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the effect of small misplacements on both the free vibration modes and forced vibration responses of a four-panel simply supported plate with two intermediate simple supports in two orthogonal directions. Kantorovich’s method is employed to obtain the natural frequencies and the corresponding vibration modes. Galerkin’s method is applied to determine the forced vibration response of the four-panel plate subjected to a harmonic concentrated load at the center of one of its four panels. Comparisons between numerical results obtained using the current approach and those using the exact solution and the finite element method are made to demonstrate the accuracy of the current approach. It is found that the small misplacements of the intermediate supports have dramatic effects on the vibration response of the plate. The larger the misplacement of the intermediate supports, the larger the degree of vibration localization. By judiciously introducing misplacements in the intermediate simple supports, the vibration of some of the four panels may be controlled.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".