MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SAG2 and SAG12 protein expression in senescing <i>Arabidopsis</i> plants

2003· article· en· W2075094236 on OpenAlexaff
Vojislava Grbić

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiologia Plantarum · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Gene Expression Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArabidopsisSenescenceBiologyGene expressionProteasesCell biologyGeneTranscriptomeMessenger RNATranscription factorMolecular biologyBiochemistryEnzymeMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During leaf senescence, nutrients are remobilized from the senescing tissues to the growing parts of the plant. Many senescence‐associated genes (SAGs) were identified based on the induction of their transcripts. However, little is known about the protein expression of the corresponding genes. We have raised antibodies against two Arabidopsis SAGs, SAG2 and SAG12, which encode putative cysteine proteases. The SAG2 antibodies recognized a 29‐kDa protein that was abundant in senescing leaves, but was also present at low levels in green tissues. SAG12 antibodies labelled a 38‐kDa protein present only in senescent leaves. The protein expression of these SAGs parallels their mRNA expression patterns, indicating that control of SAG2 and SAG12 is at the level of transcription or transcript stability. In addition, we found that SAGs are induced during stem senescence with delayed kinetics of their expression relative to leaf expression, suggesting that age‐dependent factor(s) regulating the onset of senescence in Arabidopsis may act in tissue‐dependent manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologia PlantarumSame topicPlant Gene Expression AnalysisFrench-language works237,207