MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075121303 · doi:10.1109/oceans.2014.7003219

Development of a new autonomous underwater moored mobile profiler

2014· article· en· W2075121303 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Singleton, Ralf Bachmayer, Brad de Young

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfiling (computer programming)SubseaPayload (computing)Wind profilerMarine engineeringComputer scienceMooringUnderwaterSystems engineeringReal-time computingEngineeringGeologyTelecommunicationsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Observation of the ocean environment is key to attaining the knowledge and understanding required to predict its evolving state and to respond to its condition. However, manned observation and collection of high resolution oceanographic data over long periods of time is both expensive and hazardous. Various autonomous profiling platforms have been developed to address the issue but there still exists the opportunity to develop efficient, robust, and reliable, low cost platforms to provide the data. In this paper we present the development of a new autonomous profiling system for areas along the continental shelf. The proposed design is a moored vehicle that will profile the water column by controlling the predetermined ascent/descent routine of an instrumentation payload though the use of a buoyancy engine. One of its unique features is the use of a subsea mooring to secure the profiler while still providing the ability to profile the entire water column and make a telemetry link. The profiler has two modes of dynamic behavior during its profile. One mode is similar to that of a profiler which follows a mooring line, while the other mode is similar to a winched profiler.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207