Quelle stratégie de gestion des risques côtiers pour l'union européenne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'Union européenne a conçu et mis en œuvre, ces dernières décennies, de nombreux instruments juridiques de conservation de l'environnement marin et littoral et d'encadrement des activités qui s'y déploient, contribuant ainsi à une première prise en considération des risques côtiers. Plusieurs politiques de l'Union ont servi de cadre à cette action avec l'inconvénient de la dispersion et du cloisonnement qui caractérise les approches sectorielles. Le Livre vert sur une politique maritime de l'Union se propose, désormais, de donner à l'ensemble la cohérence et la lisibilité indispensables à une véritable stratégie de gestion des risques côtiers et de garantir les meilleures conditions d'application possibles. Après avoir analysé la notion de risques côtiers et décliné les instruments juridiques existants, l'auteur propose les grands axes stratégiques d'une gestion européenne des risques, levier d'un aménagement intégré des zones côtières.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".