Role of COPI in Phagosome Maturation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phagosomes mature by sequentially fusing with endosomes and lysosomes. Vesicle budding is presumed to occur concomitantly, mediating the retrieval of plasmalemmal components and the regulation of phagosomal size. We analyzed whether fission of vesicles from phagosomes requires COPI, a multimeric complex known to be involved in budding from the Golgi and endosomes. The role of COPI was studied using ldlF cells, that harbor a temperature-sensitive mutation in epsilon-COP, a subunit of the coatomer complex. These cells were made phagocytic toward IgG-opsonized particles by heterologous expression of human FcgammaRIIA receptors. Following incubation at the restrictive temperature, epsilon-COP was degraded in these cells and their Golgi complex dispersed. Nevertheless, phagocytosis persisted for hours in cells devoid of epsilon-COP. Retrieval of transferrin receptors from phagosomes became inefficient in the absence of epsilon-COP, while clearance of the FcgammaRIIA receptors was unaffected. This indicates that fission of vesicles from the phagosomal membrane involves at least two mechanisms, one of which requires intact COPI. Traffic of fluid-phase markers and aggregated IgG-receptor complexes along the endocytic pathway was abnormal in epsilon-COP-deficient cells. In contrast, phagosome fusion with endosomes and lysosomes was unimpaired. Moreover, the resulting phagolysosomes were highly acidic. Similar results were obtained in RAW264.7 macrophages treated with brefeldin A, which precludes COPI assembly by interfering with the activation of adenosine ribosylation factor. These data indicate that neither phagosome formation nor maturation are absolutely dependent on COPI. Our findings imply that phagosomal maturation differs from endosomal progression, which appears to be more dependent on COPI-mediated formation of carrier vesicles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".