MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075166277 · doi:10.1117/12.652137

Exponential elastic model and its application in real-time simulation

2006· article· en· W2075166277 on OpenAlexaff
Hualiang Zhong, Terry M. Peters

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Material Modeling
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExponential functionNonlinear systemInterpolation (computer graphics)Equivalence (formal languages)Non-linear least squaresLeast-squares function approximationApplied mathematicsFinite element methodLinear interpolationExponential decayComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisStructural engineeringEstimation theoryEngineeringStatisticsPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of accurate material models and computational methods are two fundamental components in building a real-time realistic surgery simulator. In this paper, we use a least-squares method to calibrate an exponential model of pig liver based on the assumption of incompressible material under a uniaxial testing mode. With the obtained parameters, the stress-strain curves generated from the least-squares approach are compared to those from the corresponding model built in ABAQUS and to experimental data, resulting in mean deviations of 1.9% and 4.8%, respectively. Furthermore we demonstrate equivalence between the parameters of the exponential material model and those of linear or other nonlinear models under small strains. Finally, we incorporate this calibrated exponential model into a nonlinear finite element framework to simulate the behavior of liver during an interventional procedure, and achieve real-time performance through use of an interpolation approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicElasticity and Material ModelingFrench-language works237,207