MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2075182428 · doi:10.1115/omae2010-21109

Numerical Simulation of Ship Maneuvering in Pack Ice

2010· article· en· W2075182428 on OpenAlexaff
Dexin Zhan, Daniel Agar, Moqin He, Don Spencer, David Molyneux

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarine engineeringComputer programComputer scienceResponse amplitude operatorEngineeringSimulationHull

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents preliminary results from a computer program for simulating ship maneuvering in ice covered waters. The program is derived from two programs, Ship Maneuvering Laboratory (SML) and a discrete element numerical modeling program (DECICE). SML is an in-house code developed by Oceanic Consulting Corporation for simulating ship maneuvering in open water. It is based on a ship maneuvering model originally developed by the Japanese mathematical maneuvering group (MMG). DECICE is a discrete element method which was developed by INTERA Technologies and is used to calculate the ice loads on the ship and the interactions between ice pieces. The paper presents a summary of the mathematical methods used together with the results of some case studies for ships EXM004, PSM004 and Esso Osaka Tanker. These computer predictions include turning circle and Zig-Zag maneuvers. Comparisons and discussion of the simulated results between cases with and without ice are also provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→