MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075216054 · doi:10.4319/lol.2009.jgrebmeier.1

Biological Implications of Change in Pacific-influenced Arctic Marine Ecosystems

2009· article· en· W2075216054 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jacqueline M. Grebmeier

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography e-Lectures · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarine ecosystemArcticOceanographySea iceEcosystemContext (archaeology)Climate changeArctic ecologyGeographyThe arcticEnvironmental scienceEcologyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This lecture provides an overview of climate and biological changes in Pacific-influenced Arctic marine ecosystems. It reviews and examines the major contributing factors to these changes, including changing conditions of sea ice, freshwater input, and the alteration of marine ecosystems. Examples of these factors are provided to illustrate the potential impacts that will have broad-reaching implications for long-term ecosystem structures. This lecture also reviews the progress of various programs undertaken during recent years (i.e. Bering Sea Research Program, Canada's Three Oceans, the Russian/US Long-term Census of the Arctic Ocean, and the Western Arctic Shelf-Basin Interactions) which have provided insights into the key processes influencing ecosystem function and change in the northern Bering and Chukchi shelf regions. Data sets from these programs are included in this L&O e-Lecture, in the context of biological response to sea ice changes in the Pacific Arctic region, with accompanying discussion by the L&O e-Lecture author.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and Oceanography e-LecturesSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207