MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075228959 · doi:10.1513/pats.201108-043tt

Clinical Year in Review III:: Mechanical Ventilation, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Nonpulmonary Intensive Care Unit, and Quality Performance Assessment Metrics in Your Practice

2011· review· en· W2075228959 on OpenAlexaff
M. Elizabeth Wilcox, Margaret S. Herridge

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Thoracic Society · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineARDSMechanical ventilationIntensive care unitPneumothoraxAnesthesiaRespiratory distressVentilation (architecture)Acute respiratory distressRelative riskIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineInternal medicineLungSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

18.6%; RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54‐0.75; P , 0.001), and moreover, the rate of death after rescue therapies was significantly lower (7.5 vs. 11.3%; RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52‐0.80; P , 0.001) (3). In patients with ARDS, there was an insignificant increase in risk of pneumothorax with higher PEEP (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.94‐1.68; P ¼ 0.13), and no difference in fatal consequences from barotrauma (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.79‐1.81; P ¼ 0.39) (3). The use of neuromuscular blockers, corticosteroids, and vasopressors was similar between groups treated with higher and lower PEEP. In summary, this analysis suggests that higher PEEP is safe in patients with ARDS and may reduce the need for performing rescue therapies. Further, low to moderate levels of PEEP should be used for most patients with ALI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207