MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075253578 · doi:10.1002/mrd.1013

Prostasome‐like particles are involved in the transfer of P25b from the bovine epididymal fluid to the sperm surface

2001· article· en· W2075253578 on OpenAlexafffund
Gilles Frenette, Robert Sullivan

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Reproduction and Development · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersMedical Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEpididymisAcrosomeSpermBiologyCapacitationAndrologyAcrosome reactionWestern blotVesicleMembraneBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In bulls, P25b is a sperm protein associated with the plasma membrane covering the acrosome. The amount of P25b bound to a constant number of spermatozoa varies from one individual to the other, low levels being associated with bull subfertility. In this study, we describe the epididymal origin of P25b using Western blot analysis. Whereas P25b was undetectable on caput spermatozoa, the amount of P25b associated to a constant number of spermatozoa increases from the corpus to the cauda. Prostasome-like particles were prepared by ultracentrifugation of epididymal fluid. P25b appears to be also associated with those membranous vesicles in increasing amounts along the epididymis. P25b is anchored to the plasma membrane of spermatozoa through glycosylphosphatidyl-inositol as shown by the ability of phospholipase C. but not of high salt treatment, to release P25b. Coincubation experiments revealed that prostasome-like particles are able to transfer P25b to spermatozoa, this process being more efficient at slightly acidic pH. P25b thus appears to be a marker of sperm epididymal maturation in bulls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations152
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Reproduction and DevelopmentSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207