Benzoboroxoles as Efficient Glycopyranoside-Binding Agents in Physiological Conditions: Structure and Selectivity of Complex Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In contrast to normal boronic acids, o-hydroxymethyl phenylboronic acid (benzoboroxole) has the capability of complexing glycopyranosides efficiently in neutral water. The measurement of association constants with a panel of model hexopyranosides indicates that the preferred mode of binding is through a cis-3,4-diol, such as that found in galactopyranosides, and mass spectrometric studies support a 1:1 binding stoichiometry. The complexation of glucopyranosides is weaker, and they are bound through their 4,6-diol unit. Although several factors may explain the exceptional carbohydrate-binding behavior of this class of hemiboronic acids, the relatively high Lewis acidity of benzoboroxoles is a likely contributing factor along with subtle factors such as intramolecular hydrogen bonds with other hydroxyl groups in the resulting anionic complex. These results with hexopyranosides suggest that biologically relevant cell-surface oligosaccharides could be targeted in water using oligomeric benzoboroxole receptors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".