MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multilayer Averaged and Moment Equations for One-Dimensional Open-Channel Flows

2006· article· en· W2075306215 on OpenAlexafffund
Cenling Xia, Yee‐Chung Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydraulic Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Open-channel flowMoment (physics)Flow velocityDivision (mathematics)Channel (broadcasting)Vertical velocityGeologyMathematicsGeometryPhysicsClassical mechanicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A model is developed to account for the vertical distribution of velocity and nonhydrostatic pressure in one-dimensional open-channel flows. The model is based on both classical multilayer models and depth-averaged and moment equations. The establishment of its governing equations and the flow simulation are performed over a number of flow layers as in classical multilayer models. However, the model also allows for vertical distributions within a flow layer by including both Boussinesq terms and effective stress terms due to depth-averaging operations. These terms are evaluated on the basis of vertically linearly approximated profiles of velocity and pressure. The resulting additional coefficients can be solved by the moment equations for the relevant layers. Three verifications demonstrate satisfactory simulations for water surface profile, as well as vertical distributions for horizontal velocity, vertical velocity, and nonhydrostatic pressure. Sensitivity analysis shows that the model can be applied with fewer flow layers, more flexibility of layer division, and less computational cost than classical multilayer models, without a remarkable compromise in accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hydraulic EngineeringSame topicHydraulic flow and structuresFrench-language works237,207