MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075321243 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.2985

Selective High-Resolution Electrodeposition on Semiconductor Defect Patterns

2000· article· en· W2075321243 on OpenAlexaff
Patrik Schmuki, L. E. Erickson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrodeposition and Electroless Coatings
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSemiconductorElectrochemistryPolarization (electrochemistry)ElectrolyteSchottky barrierOptoelectronicsSchottky diodeSubstrate (aquarium)Deposition (geology)ElectrodeCathodic protectionVoltageNanotechnologyDiodeChemistryElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a new principle and technique that allows one to electrodeposit material patterns of arbitrary shape down to the submicrometer scale. We demonstrate that an electrochemical metal deposition reaction can be initiated selectively at surface defects created in a p-type Si(100) substrate by Si (++) focused ion beam bombardment. The key principle is that, for cathodic electrochemical polarization of p-type material in the dark, breakdown of the blocking Schottky barrier at the semiconductor/electrolyte interface occurs at significantly lower voltages at implanted locations than for an unimplanted surface. This difference in the threshold voltages is exploited to achieve selective electrochemical deposition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicElectrodeposition and Electroless CoatingsFrench-language works237,207