MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075332144 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2007.380020

A Non-Uniform Mesh High-Order Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method based on Biorthogonal Interpolating Functions

2007· article· en· W2075332144 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium digest · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Eye InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiorthogonal systemPolygon meshEmbeddingContext (archaeology)Basis functionFinite difference methodFinite differenceComputer scienceMathematicsApplied mathematicsAlgorithmTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematical analysisGeometryWavelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses, for the first time, the question of non-uniform meshing within the context of a recently formulated high-order finite-difference technique that employs Deslauriers-Dubuc biorthogonal interpolating basis functions for the expansion of electromagnetic field components in space. To that end, a domain overriding approach is developed and shown to present a very low level of reflections at interfaces between meshes of different densities, enhancing the accuracy and versatility of the Deslauriers-Dubuc scheme (which lends itself to the modeling of complex, inhomogeneous media, unlike earlier similar methods), while providing a generic approach to embedding subgrids within high-order finite-difference meshes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it