Immune function in patients with Shwachman–Diamond syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) is an inherited multisystem disorder characterized by exocrine pancreatic dysfunction and varying degrees of cytopenia. In addition, various immunological abnormalities have been noted. To clarify the issue of immunological competence or incompetence in SDS, we prospectively studied immune function in 11 patients with SDS. Seven suffered from recurrent bacterial infections and six from recurrent viral infections. Varying degrees of impairment were readily identified. All patients had neutropenia; total lymphocyte counts, however, were normal in all except one patient. Nine patients had B-cell defects comprising one or more of the following abnormalities: low IgG or IgG subclasses, low percentage of circulating B lymphocytes, decreased in vitro B-lymphocyte proliferation and a lack of specific antibody production. Seven out of nine patients studied had at least one T-cell abnormality comprising a low percentage of total circulating T lymphocytes or CD3+/CD4+ cell subpopulations or decreased in vitro T-lymphocyte proliferation. Five out of six patients studied had decreased percentages of circulating natural killer cells. Moreover, neutrophil chemotaxis was significantly low in all the patients studied. These data point to a major immunodeficiency component in SDS that places patients at heightened risk of infections, even if neutrophil numbers are protective. This finding broadens the definition of the syndrome substantially: it suggests that the SDS marrow defect occurs at the level of an early haematological-lymphocytic stem cell or that a combined marrow and thymic stromal defect accounts for the aberrant function of haematopoietic and lymphopoietic lineages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".