Inadvertent postdialysis anticoagulation due to heparin line locks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large-bore dual lumen in-dwelling venous catheters are used in hemodialysis. These catheters are usually locked with heparin after the treatment. This study addressed the underappreciated postdialysis coagulopathy that can result. Thirty-six patients were included: 7 dialyzed through arterio-venous fistulae, 29 through in-dwelling venous catheters. The latter group was further subdivided according to whether they received heparin or heparin-free dialysis. To assess the heparin lock, a full-dose heparin lock as well as a much weaker heparin lock and a citrate lock were used. To assess the coagulopathy, blood was taken 1 hr after dialysis. The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and anti-Xa level was measured. Additionally, 6 venous catheters were removed and the amount of fluid expelled upon locking with saline was measured. Clotting from the patient group with arterio-venous fistulae was normal following dialysis. The patients with in-dwelling venous catheters and heparin locks had significantly deranged clotting; 6 out of 10 patients had abnormal APTT results. All patients with catheters, heparin-free dialysis, and heparin locks had deranged clotting (7 out of 7). The rate decreased significantly when heparinized saline was used as a lock. A subset of patients had a citrate lock rather than a heparin lock; the clotting results normalized in all but one patient. An in vitro study demonstrated immediate leakage of fluid from the end of the ports upon locking. Significant postdialysis anticoagulation can occur after dialysis, which can be attributed to the heparin line locks. This risk is considerably reduced when a citrate lock is used instead.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".