MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075351895 · doi:10.1142/s0218196700000364

POLYNOMIAL INDEX GROWTH GROUPS

2000· article· en· W2075351895 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Antal Balog, László Pyber, Avinoam Mann

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Algebra and Computation · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHebrew University of JerusalemUniversity of AlbertaBG Group
KeywordsMathematicsPolynomialExponentConjectureIndex (typography)Simple (philosophy)Bounded functionCombinatoricsOrder (exchange)Classification of finite simple groupsConstant (computer programming)Pure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsGroup of Lie typeMathematical analysisGroup theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that the order of a finite simple of Lie type is bounded by a small constant power of its exponent. This confirms, in a strengthened form, a conjecture of Vaughan-Lee and Zel'manov on the order and exponent of almost simple groups. We also obtain various structural restrictions on groups of polynomial index growth. Combining the above results we construct finitely generated residually finite groups of polynomial index growth which are neither linear nor boundedly generated. This answers questions of Segal and Platonov–Rapinchuk respectively. A further question of Platonov–Rapinchuk concerning a weakened polynomial index growth assumption is also answered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Algebra and ComputationSame topicAdvanced Topics in AlgebraFrench-language works237,207