MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075356270 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2007.4488816

Low-nose CMOS active transformer voltage-controlled oscillators

2007· article· en· W2075356270 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSInductorPhase noiseVoltage-controlled oscillatorElectrical engineeringTransformerElectronic engineeringEngineeringTransistorVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents CMOS active transformers synthesized using MOS transistors only and their applications in VCOs. The characteristics of CMOS active transformers are analyzed, and the self and mutual components of the quality factor of transformers are investigated. Simulation results of LC, quadrature, and transformer VCOs with active inductors and active transformers show that active transformer VCOs exhibit a much lower level of phase noise as compared with corresponding LC and quadrature VCOs with active inductors. The phase noise of the designed 1.5 GHz active transformer VCO in TSMC-0.18 mum 1.8 V CMOS technology is -109.4dBc/Hz at a 1 MHz offset the carrier and is comparable to that of VCO with spiral inductors. The power consumption of the oscillator is 30.5 mW with 83 mum <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> active area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it