MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075357945 · doi:10.1109/itw.2014.6970892

Dirty interference cancellation for Gaussian broadcast channels

2014· article· en· W2075357945 on OpenAlexaff
Ruchen Duan, Yingbin Liang, Ashish Khisti, Shlomo Shamai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceInterference (communication)Transmission (telecommunications)GaussianComputer networkChannel state informationFocus (optics)Topology (electrical circuits)TelecommunicationsIndependent and identically distributed random variablesMathematicsWirelessEngineeringRandom variableElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The state-dependent broadcast channel with a helper is investigated, in which a transmitter wishes to send messages to two receivers via a broadcast channel. The channel is corrupted by an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) state sequence which is known to neither the transmitter nor the receivers. A helper that knows the state sequence noncausally assists the broadcast transmission to cancel state interference. Two scenarios are studied. In scenario 1, the transmitter sends one message to both receivers, and in scenario II, the transmitter sends two private messages respectively to two receivers. Our focus is on the Gaussian channel with additive state. Inner and outer bounds are derived for both scenarios. By comparing the inner and outer bounds, capacity/capacity region are characterized under various ranges of channel parameters. Practical impact of the model and results are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207