MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bilateral progressive necrotizing retinochoroiditis in an immunocompromised patient: histopathological diagnosis

2008· article· en· W2075362986 on OpenAlexaff
Rubens Belfort, Steve Rasmussen, Amin Kherani, Nidhi Lodha, Geoff Williams, Bruno F. Fernandes, Miguel N. Burnier

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Ophthalmologica · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesRockyview General HospitalUniversity of CalgaryMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRetinitisOphthalmologyVitrectomyPosterior segment of eyeballChoroidFundus (uterus)Retinal detachmentRetinalVisual acuityPathologyRetinaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 66-year-old man with a 10-year history of splenic B-cell lymphoma and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia presented with floaters and photopsia in the right eye. The fundus exam showed a few retinal haemorrhages with vitritis (Fig. 1A and 1B). The diagnosis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis was made. The patient was treated with topical steroids, atropine, brimonidine, repeated injections of intravitreal gancyclovir and a short course of oral valganciclovir 900 mg twice daily. The patient’s right eye stabilized and vision improved to 20/25. After 1 month, he presented with similar lesions on the left eye accompanied by anterior chamber haemorrhage (Fig. 1C). The left eye received treatment similar to the right eye. Despite treatment, the disease in his left eye progressed and vision deteriorated to counting fingers. A diagnostic vitrectomy was performed in his left eye and, despite negative cultures and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for viruses and lymphoma, the patient continued treatment for CMV retinitis based on clinical suspicion and apparent response to treatment in his right eye. He then received a higher dosage of intravitreal ganclovir (1 mg). However, there was no improvement and even perception of light was lost in his left eye. A diagnostic enucleation was performed and the specimen showed large areas or retinal necrosis and extensive inflammatory infiltrate within the choroid (Fig. 1D). A few retinal toxoplasma cysts could be seen (Fig. 1E), confirmed by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 1F). Also, eosinophilic deposits under the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) corresponding to necrosis of Bruch’s membrane were present (Fig. 1E). Based on the histopathological findings, the diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis was made. Unfortunately, because of complications of his systemic disease, the patient died soon after the diagnosis was made. (A and B) Funduscopic examination of the right eye with extensive necrotizing retinochoroiditis associated with vitreous inflammatory reaction and absence of ophthalmoscopically visible chorioretinal scarring. (C) Slit-lamp photography of the left eye showing anterior chamber haemorrhage. (D) Area of extensive retinal necrosis and choroidal granulomatous inflammation [haematoxylin and eosin (H&E), × 100]. (E) High magnification of a necrotic retina with a large cyst (arrow) and eosinophilic deposit under the retinal pigment epithelium (arrowhead) (H&E, × 400). (F) Immunohistochemical staining labels in red showing a toxoplasma cyst within the retina (× 400). Ocular toxoplasmosis is caused by the protozoa Toxoplasma gondii, and can be acquired congenitally or by ingesting uncooked infected meat or contaminated vegetables and water (Silveira et al. 1988). In immunocompetent patients it usually presents as a unilateral granulomatous uveitis with retinochoroiditis and moderated to severe vitritis. Recurrences are usually observed as an active retinal lesion adjacent or near to a retinochoroidal scar. In immunocompromised patients, the presentation of toxoplasmosis can be atypical. Multiple lesions, bilaterality, retinal vasculitis, retinal vascular occlusions, retinal detachments, pigmentary retinopathy mimicking retinitis pigmentosa, neuroretinitis, optic neuropathy (Kallenbach & Frederiksen 2008) and scleritis are some of the unusual presentations (Smith & Cunningham 2002). CMV retinopathy is an opportunistic infection that usually affects immunocompromised patients. It typically presents with retinal necrosis accompanied by haemorrhage and little inflammatory response. Ocular toxoplasmosis in immunodeficient patients might present in a very similar clinical picture. Although for most patients the distinction can be made on clinical grounds, histopathology is occasionally required to distinguish between the two aetiologies. Pathological diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis can be obtained by chorioretinal biopsies or diagnostic enucleation. The toxoplasma cysts are identified with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E), immunohistochemistry (Rao & Font 1977) or by PCR (Brezin et al. 1990). In some cases, chorioretinal biopsies yield sufficient material to avoid enucleation. Additionally, vitreous and humour aqueous samples can be analysed using PCR to identify parasite DNA (Burg et al. 1989); serum levels of chemokines (CXCL8) can also be used, particularly during follow-up (Goncalves et al. 2007). For the diagnosis of CMV retinitis, infected giant cells are seen easily in most cases. Whenever the hallmarks of each condition are not seen readily, other pathological findings are useful to make such a distinction. Ocular toxoplasmosis often presents extensive granulomatous inflammatory infiltration of the choroid and areas of necrosis of Bruch’s membrane – neither of which are seen in CMV retinitis. The latter is of particular interest because it may partially explain why immunocompetent patients present choroidal inflammation even though the parasite is invariably confined to the retina. The breaks in Bruch’s membrane would permit the contact of the choroid with infectious antigen that secondarily would cause an inflammatory response. Also, these focal areas of necrosis are an important clue to establish the correct diagnosis of toxoplasmosis – especially in immunocompromised patients, when the inflammatory infiltrate may be minimal or absent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa OphthalmologicaSame topicToxoplasma gondii Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207