MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075388376 · doi:10.1063/1.1287637

Area detector based photon correlation in the regime of short data batches: Data reduction for dynamic x-ray scattering

2000· article· en· W2075388376 on OpenAlexaff
D. Lumma, L. B. Lurio, S. G. J. Mochrie, Mark Sutton

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutocorrelationDetectorScatteringDynamic light scatteringData reductionOpticsPhysicsCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Noise (video)PhotonData acquisitionPhoton countingReduction (mathematics)Computational physicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method for reducing time sequences of raw scattering images to intensity time-autocorrelation functions is presented. The procedure is based on the use of a charge coupled device (CCD) area detector, and optimized for operating in the regime of short data batches. Its application to x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy (XPCS) measurements is described in detail. Using a slow-scan CCD, we explain how to achieve data acquisition on a 30 ms or faster time scale, while simultaneously acquiring data from many coherence areas in parallel. The statistical uncertainties of the acquired XPCS data are quantified experimentally, and compared to the theoretically expected noise levels of the correlation functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations148
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207