Continuous current and surface potential models for undoped and lightly doped double-gate metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have introduced a continuous, explicit, surface potential model for symmetric undoped and lightly doped double gate metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor devices. The surface potential model considered both hole and electron quasi-Fermi potential effects. An explicit current model has been introduced in terms of both source and drain charge densities at which hole and electron quasi-Fermi level or IMREFs are defined. The introduced models are directly related to the device biasing and device structure without the need for fitting parameters. Both of the surface potential and current models are continuous from below to above threshold and from linear to saturation of operation regimes. Good agreement has been obtained when our analytical models are compared to numerical results. The effects of hole IMREF on the small-signal (or ac) parameters are also reported. We predicted that the presence of holes has raised the saturation voltage. Also, we have observed from the gate capacitance curve that the hole IMREF should be taken into our account for low frequency applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".