MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075420844 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2004.88.8.909c

First Report of <i>Cherry virus A</i> and <i>Little cherry virus</i>-1 in Poland

2004· article· en· W2075420844 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B. Komorowska, M. Cieślińska

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPrunusHorticulturePlant virusVirusMottleFruit treeOrchardCultivarBotanyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cherry virus A (CVA), a member of the genus Capillovirus, has been reported in sweet cherry in Germany, Canada, and Great Britain. No data are available on the effects of CVA on fruit quality and yield of infected trees. Little cherry disease (LChD) occurs in most cherry growing areas of the world. Symptoms on sensitive cultivars include discolored fruit that remain small, pointed in shape, and tasteless. Three Closterovirus spp. associated with LChD have been described (Little cherry virus-1 [LChV-1], LChV-2, and LChV-3). Diseased local and commercial cultivars of sour cherry trees were found in a Prunus sp. germplasm collection and orchards in Poland during the 2003 growing season. The foliar symptoms included irregular, chlorotic mottling, distortion, and premature falling of leaves. Some of the diseased trees developed rosette as a result of decreased growth and shortened internodes. Severely infected branches exhibited dieback symptoms. Because the symptoms were suggestive of a possible virus infection, leaf samples were collected from 38 trees and assayed for Prune dwarf virus and Prunus necrotic ringspot virus using double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA). RNA extracted from leaves was used in a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with the One-Step RT-PCR with Platinum Taq (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and primer sets specific for CVA (1), LChV-1 (3), and LChV-2 (3). The RNA samples were also tested using RT-PCR for detection of Cherry mottle leaf virus (CMLV), Cherry necrotic rusty mottle virus (CNRMV), and Cherry green ring mottle virus (CGRMV) with specific primer sets (2). Amplification of a 397-bp coat protein gene product confirmed infection of 15 trees with CVA. A 419-bp fragment corresponding to the coat protein gene of LChV-1 was amplified from cv. Gisela rootstock and local cv. WVIII/1. To confirm RT-PCR results, CVA amplification products from local cv. WX/5 and LChV-1 from cvs. Gisela and WVIII/1 were cloned in bacterial vector pCR 2.1-TOPO and then sequenced. The sequences were analyzed with the Lasergene (DNASTAR, Madison, WI) computer program. The alignment indicated that the nucleotide sequence of cv. WX/5 was closely related to the published sequences of CVA (Genbank Accession No. NC_003689) and had an 89% homology to the corresponding region. The nucleotide sequence similarity between the 419-bp fragment obtained from cvs. Gisela and WVIII/1 was 87% and 91%, respectively, compared with the reference isolate of LChV-1 (Genbank Accession No. NC_001836). The sampled trees tested negative for LChV-2, CGRMV, CMLV, and CNRMV using RT-PCR. Some trees tested positive for PNRSV and PDV. To our knowledge, this is the first report of CVA and LChV-1 in Poland. References: (1) D. James and W. Jelkmann. Acta Hortic. 472:299, 1998. (2) M. E. Rott and W. Jelkmann. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 107:411,2001. (3) M. E. Rott and W. Jelkmann. Phytopathology. 91:61, 2001.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207