First Report of <i>Cherry virus A</i> and <i>Little cherry virus</i>-1 in Poland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cherry virus A (CVA), a member of the genus Capillovirus, has been reported in sweet cherry in Germany, Canada, and Great Britain. No data are available on the effects of CVA on fruit quality and yield of infected trees. Little cherry disease (LChD) occurs in most cherry growing areas of the world. Symptoms on sensitive cultivars include discolored fruit that remain small, pointed in shape, and tasteless. Three Closterovirus spp. associated with LChD have been described (Little cherry virus-1 [LChV-1], LChV-2, and LChV-3). Diseased local and commercial cultivars of sour cherry trees were found in a Prunus sp. germplasm collection and orchards in Poland during the 2003 growing season. The foliar symptoms included irregular, chlorotic mottling, distortion, and premature falling of leaves. Some of the diseased trees developed rosette as a result of decreased growth and shortened internodes. Severely infected branches exhibited dieback symptoms. Because the symptoms were suggestive of a possible virus infection, leaf samples were collected from 38 trees and assayed for Prune dwarf virus and Prunus necrotic ringspot virus using double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA). RNA extracted from leaves was used in a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with the One-Step RT-PCR with Platinum Taq (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and primer sets specific for CVA (1), LChV-1 (3), and LChV-2 (3). The RNA samples were also tested using RT-PCR for detection of Cherry mottle leaf virus (CMLV), Cherry necrotic rusty mottle virus (CNRMV), and Cherry green ring mottle virus (CGRMV) with specific primer sets (2). Amplification of a 397-bp coat protein gene product confirmed infection of 15 trees with CVA. A 419-bp fragment corresponding to the coat protein gene of LChV-1 was amplified from cv. Gisela rootstock and local cv. WVIII/1. To confirm RT-PCR results, CVA amplification products from local cv. WX/5 and LChV-1 from cvs. Gisela and WVIII/1 were cloned in bacterial vector pCR 2.1-TOPO and then sequenced. The sequences were analyzed with the Lasergene (DNASTAR, Madison, WI) computer program. The alignment indicated that the nucleotide sequence of cv. WX/5 was closely related to the published sequences of CVA (Genbank Accession No. NC_003689) and had an 89% homology to the corresponding region. The nucleotide sequence similarity between the 419-bp fragment obtained from cvs. Gisela and WVIII/1 was 87% and 91%, respectively, compared with the reference isolate of LChV-1 (Genbank Accession No. NC_001836). The sampled trees tested negative for LChV-2, CGRMV, CMLV, and CNRMV using RT-PCR. Some trees tested positive for PNRSV and PDV. To our knowledge, this is the first report of CVA and LChV-1 in Poland. References: (1) D. James and W. Jelkmann. Acta Hortic. 472:299, 1998. (2) M. E. Rott and W. Jelkmann. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 107:411,2001. (3) M. E. Rott and W. Jelkmann. Phytopathology. 91:61, 2001.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".