MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075425344 · doi:10.1103/physreve.69.016604

Effective field theory for the nonlinear optical properties of photonic crystals

2004· article· en· W2075425344 on OpenAlex
J. E. Sipe, Navin A. R. Bhat, Philip Chak, Suresh Pereira

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemField (mathematics)Photonic crystalNonlinear opticalNonlinear opticsPhotonicsMaterials scienceStatistical physicsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsOpticsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce an effective field theory for the nonlinear optics of photonic crystals of arbitrary dimensionality. Based on a canonical Hamiltonian formulation of Maxwell's equations, canonical effective fields are introduced to describe the electromagnetic field. Conserved quantities are easily constructed and their physical significance identified; the formalism can be easily quantized. We illustrate the approach by considering a periodic Kerr medium, and show how the nonlinear coupled mode and nonlinear Schrödinger equations emerge. We extend the latter to treat optical shock effects, and compare our canonical formulation with earlier treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it