MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075436524 · doi:10.1080/10798587.2014.901651

Emotional Learning Based Position Control of Pneumatic Actuators

2014· article· en· W2075436524 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntelligent Automation & Soft Computing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceActuatorPosition (finance)Control (management)Pneumatic actuatorPosition paperArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new scheme for position tracking of pneumatic actuators. The controller is built upon the Brain Emotional Learning Based Intelligent Control (BELBIC) concept proposed by Caro Lucas [Lucas, C., Shahmirzadi, D., & Sheikholeslami, N. (2004). Introducing BELBIC: Brain emotional learning based intelligent controller. International Journal of Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing, 10, 11–21]. First the structure of BELBIC is analyzed to further understand its features. Next, different types of emotional signals, required by BELBIC, are experimentally evaluated to meet the challenges in position tracking of pneumatic actuators. The best performing BELBIC structure is then experimentally compared with a previously developed robust proportional integral controller. It is also successfully applied to a force reflecting tele-operated application of pneumatic actuator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it