MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075437069 · doi:10.1680/stbu.2010.163.4.267

Moment-resisting bolted timber connections

2010· article· en· W2075437069 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringConnection (principal bundle)ReinforcementPerpendicularMoment (physics)Materials scienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionFastenerComposite materialEngineeringMathematicsGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper evaluates the performance of moment-resisting bolted timber connections with self-tapping wood screws acting as perpendicular-to-grain reinforcement. Considering an unreinforced joist-to-column connection with slotted-in steel plates as baseline, an increase in capacity by a factor of 1·7 was observed when the connections were reinforced with self-tapping screws under reverse cyclic loading. This was further increased by 22·5% when the bolt diameter in the reinforced connection was increased from 19·0 to 25·4 mm. Reducing the edge distances of the bolts in the reinforced connection provided addition gain in capacity of 35·3% to a total capacity increase by a factor of 2·9 when compared to the unreinforced connections while maintaining very ductile behaviour. The results show that it is feasible to create ductile and high-capacity moment-resisting bolted timber connections with self-tapping wood screws as reinforcements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it