MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075453422 · doi:10.1080/10473220390237610

Investigating Respiratory Responses to Metalworking Fluid Exposure

2003· article· en· W2075453422 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational exposure and asthma
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesCanada Auto Workers
FundersGeneral Motors of Canada
KeywordsMedicineSore throatPhlegmRespiratory systemNoseChillsThroatSurgeryInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In response to worker and union representative concerns, the association between metalworking fluid exposure and respiratory symptoms was investigated in a cross-sectional survey, in a large automotive machining location. A self-administered respiratory symptom-screening questionnaire was sent to 2935 current employees. MWF exposure levels were assigned to respondents on a departmental basis based on average and "peak" area aerosol measurements. MWF exposure, years in the plant, and smoking status were regressed on presence or absence of daily or weekly respiratory symptoms, as well as upper and lower respiratory symptom groupings derived from principal components factor analysis. The response rate was 81 percent. Symptom prevalence was high: 29 percent of subjects reported weekly or daily phlegm; 23 percent, dry cough; 42 percent, runny or plugged nose. Average aerosol concentration in departments with exposure ranged from 0.02 to 0.84 mg/m(3), and peak levels from 0.02 to 2.85 mg/m(3). Average exposures ranging from 0.25 to 0.84 mg/m(3), as compared to exposures in the range of 0.02 to 0.09 mg/m(3), were statistically significantly associated with wheezing, chest tightness, sore throat, and hoarse throat, as well as with the upper respiratory symptom grouping. When peak exposure was included in the regression, it exerted a stronger effect than average exposure level on dry cough, phlegm, wheezing, fever/chills, and hoarse throat, as well as on upper and lower respiratory symptom groupings. These effects were independent of smoking status. Exposure-symptom trends for the average and peak departmental area concentration categories were statistically significant for the upper and lower respiratory symptom groupings and for most individual symptoms. We have observed an association of increasing upper and lower respiratory symptoms with estimated MWF exposure, measured independently, at average departmental aerosol concentrations well below the NIOSH recommended personal exposure level of 0.5 mg/m(3). The results have been used to prioritize exposure reduction efforts in the workplace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it