MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075476594 · doi:10.2307/4127373

Women, War and Peace in South Asia: Beyond Victimhood to Agency.

2002· article· en· W2075476594 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vidhu Verma

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Affairs · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSouth Asian Studies and Conflicts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Political scienceDevelopment economicsPolitical economyGender studiesSociologySocial scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Where Are the Women in South Asian Conflicts? - Rita Manchanda Guns and Burqa - Rita Manchanda Women in the Kashmir Conflict Ambivalent Empowerment - Darini Rajasingham-Senanayake The Tragedy of Tamil Women in Conflict Between Two Armed Patriarchies - Paula Banerjee Women in Assam and Nagaland 'They Use Us and Others Abuse Us!' - Anis Haroon Women in the MQM Conflict Where There Are No Men - Amrita Baskota, Shobha Gautam and Rita Manchanda Women in the Maoist Insurgency in Nepal Women's Narratives from the Chittagong Hill Tracts - Meghna Guhathakurta

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.025
Scholarly communication0.0090.010
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations148
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacific AffairsSame topicSouth Asian Studies and ConflictsFrench-language works237,207