MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075485464 · doi:10.1134/s1063774506030047

Mn, Mg, and Zn ilmenite group titanates: A reconnaissance rietveld study

2006· article· en· W2075485464 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystallography Reports · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetallurgical and Alloy Processes
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIlmeniteOctahedronRietveld refinementCrystallographyPolyhedronGroup (periodic table)Materials sciencePowder diffractionCrystal structureChemistryMineralogyMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ecandrewsite-geikielite (Zn 1/2 Mg 1/2 TiO 3 ), ecandrewsite-pyrophanite (Zn 1/2 Mn 1/2 TiO 3 ), pyrophanite-geikielite (Mg 1/2 Mn 1/2 TiO 3 ), and ecandrewsite-pyrophanite-geikielite (Zn 1/3 Mn 1/3 Mg 1/3 TiO 3 ) titanates were synthesized at 900–1000°C at ambient pressure. All of the compounds adopt R — ilmenite-type structures. These structures were refined by the Rietveld method from X-ray powder diffraction data. Unit cell parameters and unit cell volumes decrease with decreasing average radii of the A 2+ cation. All structures consist of distorted AO 6 and TiO 6 octahedra. In common with pyrophanite and ilmenite, the distortion of the AO 6 octahedra is less than that of the TiO 6 octahedra. Data are given for the volumes and distortion indexes of all coordination polyhedra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it