MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075492270 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.67.081202

Empirical tight-binding model for the electronic structure of dilute GaNAs alloys

2003· article· en· W2075492270 on OpenAlexaff
N. Shtinkov, P. Desjardins, R. A. Masut

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrillouin zoneElectronic band structureElectronic structureTight bindingCondensed matter physicsParametrization (atmospheric modeling)Conduction bandHeterojunctionPhysicsMaterials scienceQuantum mechanicsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an empirical tight-binding (TB) model for the electronic structure of ${\mathrm{GaN}}_{x}{\mathrm{As}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}$ with nitrogen content $x<5%,$ over the entire Brillouin zone. The model upgrades existing TB schemes, introducing an additional s orbital to account for the N-induced change of conduction-band states. The resulting band structure is analyzed using an ${\mathrm{sp}}^{3}{d}^{5}{s}^{*}$ TB parametrization and compared to experimental and other theoretical data. The model reproduces the results of the band anticrossing model at the \ensuremath{\Gamma} point of the Brillouin zone, and the dependence of the X and L band-edge states on the N concentration is in good agreement with experimental data. The model is readily applicable to electronic structure calculations of other III-N-V compounds and heterostructures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207