L’écrivain comme journaliste sportif (ou vice versa) : The sportswriter de Richard Ford
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ex-jeune écrivain prometteur devenu journaliste sportif douze ans auparavant, Frank Bascombe, qui a grandi dans le Sud des États-Unis, est le narrateur et le personnage principal de The Sportswriter (1986) de Richard Ford. Le temps du roman est bref : trois jours, allant du vendredi saint à Pâques, en avril 1984. Si le roman est écrit au présent, le temps de l'écriture, lui, se situe entre ces trois jours et l'épilogue, en septembre de la même année. Minimaliste grand format, Bascombe pose sans cesse des questions touchant l'écriture et la communication : pourquoi a-t-il choisi l'écriture sportive plutôt que l'écriture romanesque ? Cette question ellemême mène à deux autres : pourquoi cette volonté d'écrire toujours au présent ? Pourquoi ce goût de la description méticuleuse des simples faits quotidiens alors que le sport et le journalisme sportif constituent des lieux privilégiés de la communication spectaculaire et nostalgique ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".